redact nested lists inside structs #77
Merged
+104
−4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hogiyogi597
force-pushed
the
redact-lists
branch
from
6678d54 to
309eb67
Compare
|
Thank you! |
|
Thanks for looking at this @woylie ! We just ran into the need for the Also, do you know when you're planning on releasing a new version for the library that would include this fix? |
|
Hey @hogiyogi597, I just released 1.2.4. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes, structs will have a list of fields that could be loaded from an Ecto
preload. These should be redacted just like a nested struct would be.The current behavior is a
CaseClauseError: